iPhone Screen Protector Bubbles - New Silicone Case UK Online

iphone screen protector bubbles might be the same size as the iPhone, but that doesn't mean you don't want a spiffy new case for it.

Samsung, meanwhile, had accused Apple of infringing US patents Nos. 6,226,449 and 5,579,239. The '449 patent, which Samsung purchased from Hitachi, involves camera and folder organization functionality. The '239 patent, which Samsung also acquired, covers video transmission functionality, and the Korean company accused Apple's FaceTime of infringing the technology. What patents were found to be infringed?. The jury found all of Samsung's accused gadgets infringed Apple's '647 "quick links" patent but that none infringed the '959 "universal search" patent or the '414 "background sync" patent. Results were mixed for the '721 "slide to unlock" patent, with some Samsung devices, such as the Galaxy Nexus, found to infringe, and others found not to. Judge Koh, in a pretrial judgement, had already ruled that Samsung infringed the '172 "automatic word correction" patent, and the jury simply calculated damages.

What gadgets were found to infringe?, The Samsung Admire, Galaxy Nexus, Galaxy Note, Galaxy S2, Galaxy S2 Epic 4G Touch, Galaxy S2 Skyrocket, and Stratosphere infringed Apple's '172 patent, Those device -- as well as the Galaxy Note 2, Galaxy S3, and Galaxy Tab 2 (10.1) iphone screen protector bubbles -- also infringed Apple's '647 patent, The Samsung Admire, Galaxy Nexus, and Stratosphere were found to infringe Apple's 721 patent, Apple's iPhone 4, iPhone 4S, iPhone 5, iPod Touch (fifth generation, 2012), and iPod Touch (fourth generation, 2011) were found to infringe Samsung's '449 patent..

To see what patents each Samsung device is accused of infringing (denoted by an X), and what patents the jury ultimately decided Samsung did violate (denoted by an asterisked X*), refer to the chart below. Outlined below are the Apple devices the jury deemed guilty of patent violation. How long did the trial last?. The case kicked off March 31 with jury selection and wrapped up May 5. Court was in session Mondays, Tuesdays, and Fridays throughout the month of April, with the companies granted a total of 52 hours of testimony, three hours of opening arguments, and four hours of closings. The jury started its deliberations late in the day April 29. It reached a verdict at the end of the day May 2, but Judge Koh recalled the jury May 5 to recalculate one of the damages figures.

What did the jury miscalculate?, It had awarded Apple no damages for one version of the Galaxy S2, but Apple believed it should be awarded some money iphone screen protector bubbles for Samsung's infringement of the '172 patent, The jury had granted Apple $4.02 million for the Galaxy S2 Epic 4G Touch and $5.8 million for the Galaxy S2 Skyrocket, After reconsidering the figures, the jury shuffled around damages awarded to each of the Galaxy S2 models but didn't change the total, The jury foreman, Tom Dunham, said it was a "clerical error."Who won?..

That's tricky. Both companies were found guilty of infringing some of each other's patents and ordered to pay damages. Ultimately, it wasn't a clear-cut win for either company, but the verdict also wasn't the overwhelming defeat Samsung faced in 2012. By awarding Apple less than 10 percent of the damages it wanted, the jury of mostly tech novices, which deliberated for three full days after a four-week trial, sent a much different message than the prior trial that netted Apple nearly $1 billion. Samsung surely feels relieved by the outcome, though it still was deemed a copycat in some respects. And Apple, which was vindicated in some of its accusations, probably believes Samsung's punishment is too light.

How much money was involved?, The jury ordered Samsung to pay $119.6 million for infringing three of Apple's five patents, much less than the iphone screen protector bubbles $2.2 billion the iPhone maker had demanded, At the same time, Apple was ordered to pay Samsung $158,400 for infringing one of the Korean company's two patents, Samsung had asked for $6.2 million in damages, and it had argued that if it had infringed all of Apple's patents, it only owed $38.4 million, While the companies asked for damages, the case was about more than money, What's really at stake is the market for mobile devices, Apple now gets two-thirds of its sales from the iPhone and iPad; South Korea-based Samsung is the world's largest maker of smartphones; and both want to keep dominating the market..

How did the companies react to the verdict?. Apple said Friday, following the verdict. "Today's ruling reinforces what courts around the world have already found: that Samsung willfully stole our ideas and copied our products. We are fighting to defend the hard work that goes into beloved products like the iPhone, which our employees devote their lives to designing and delivering for our customers."Samsung said Monday, following the jury recalculation. "We agree with the jury's decision to reject Apple's grossly exaggerated damages claim. Although we are disappointed by the finding of infringement, we are vindicated that for the second time in the US, Apple has been found to infringe Samsung's patents. It is our long history of innovation and commitment to consumer choice, that has driven us to become the leader in the mobile industry today."What role did Google play in all of this?.

Samsung argued during the trial that most features Apple said infringed were part of Android, Google's mobile operating system that powers Samsung's devices, All patents except one, called "slide to unlock," are built into Android, the Korean company said, and it accused Apple of attacking Android, Apple argued that the patent infringement trial had nothing to do with Android, It came out during the trial, however, that Google was helping Samsung with its defense for two patents, '414 for background syncing and '959 for universal search, Those patents wielded by Apple directly target features of Android that Google developed, including the Google search box and Gmail, The other patents iphone screen protector bubbles target features that can be tweaked by handset makers or by the Android open source community..