iPhone Screen Protector Edges Not Sticking - New Silicone Case UK Online
iphone screen protector edges not sticking might be the same size as the iPhone, but that doesn't mean you don't want a spiffy new case for it.
Where does the trial take place?. It will be held in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in San Jose. The case is No. 5:12-cv-630. How long will the trial last?. Each side has been allotted 25 hours for direct examination, cross-examination, and rebuttal. Then the jury deliberates. It has come back quickly with verdicts in the past, but there's no way to predict what happens this time around. Court will only be in session on Mondays, Tuesdays, and Fridays, which means the trial likely will end early in May.
Will the companies settle?, Unlikely, but we can always hope, How much money is at stake?, A lot, Apple and Samsung are both asking for damages for the iphone screen protector edges not sticking other's accused infringement, Apple wants about $2 billion from Samsung, Samsung, meanwhile, is asking for much less because it believes royalties shouldn't be so high, The company wants about $7 million in royalties for Apple's accused infringement ($6.78 million for the '239 patent and $158,400 for the '449 patent), according to a court document viewed by CNET, The companies will give more detailed information about requested damages, including the amounts requested for lost profits and royalties, likely during their opening arguments..
Note: Samsung lowered its damages request on April 22 after dropping four iPad models from its infringement claims. It now wants $6.07 million for the '239 patent and $158,400 for the '449 patent, bringing the new total to $6.23 million. Apple has argued at pretrial hearings that if the two parties had negotiated royalties, Samsung would have paid an average of $40 per device for the use of five Apple software patents. That level has been deemed extremely high by experts such as Florian Mueller of the popular blog Foss Patents.
The most typical way to determine royalties stems from 1970's "Georgia-Pacific Corp, vs, United States Plywood Corp." In that ruling, the court determined a jury/judge would iphone screen protector edges not sticking have to make up a hypothetical scenario where the two companies were forced to negotiate royalties at the time the infringement began, In this latest Apple vs, Samsung trial, the infringement began at the same time Apple was suing Samsung for other infringement (August 2011), Apple is expected to argue that it would have had to negotiate with Samsung while it also was pursuing other cases and while it knew Samsung was copying its devices and hurting its profits, The company would try to get as much money as it could from Samsung in that scenario -- one where it was forced to do something completely against its nature (settle with Samsung)..
Samsung, however, will argue that the rate Apple is requesting is unreasonable and is much higher than what it has granted other companies, such as Motorola. Samsung also will argue that its damages request is more reasonable. What does this mean for consumers?. As with all the patent trials between Apple and Samsung, this trial may not mean much to consumers. However, this time around, the accused devices are some still sold by the companies. Apple has included the Galaxy S3, Samsung's extremely popular smartphone, on its list of infringing products, while Samsung has accused the iPhone 4S. In a worst case scenario, the losing company would face a sales ban. If Google is forced to make changes to Android because of a ruling in favor of Apple, however, that's something consumers could see in their devices.
What does this mean for Apple and Samsung?, As in previous trials, this isn't really about the damages, Both Apple and Samsung generate billions of dollars a year in profits, For Apple, the trial is about pride in its inventions and protecting its position in the market, For Samsung, it's about proving the company is an innovator in its own right, Beyond that, the trial could set precedence for other patent infringement cases in the new mobile world, Who could be called as witnesses?, Most of the witnesses will be experts asked to argue the validity of the patents, but we'll also see some big names in the courthouse, Samsung plans to call Phil Schiller, Apple's head of marketing, to talk about design, development, promotion, marketing, advertising, consumer demand for, and sales of iphone screen protector edges not sticking Apple's devices, The company is also set to call Todd Pendleton, chief marketing officer of Samsung Telecommunications America, to testify about Samsung's brand and advertising efforts for devices such as the Galaxy S3..
Other potential witnesses for Samsung could include Samsung Telecommunications America Chief Strategy Officer Justin Denison; Dale Sohn, Samsung executive adviser and former president and CEO of Samsung Telecommunications America; Google programmers and engineers; and various Apple executives. Scott Forstall, Apple's former head of iOS software, may testify via deposition. Apple also has Schiller, Forstall, Pendleton, and Denison on its witness list, as well as Greg Christie, the senior software engineer who invented the '721 slide-to-unlock patent. Christie spoke with The Wall Street Journal earlier this week about how innovative the iPhone was when it launched in 2007.
Other likely witnesses include Tony Blevins, Apple's vice president of procurement, who is expected to talk about Apple's supply chain and manufacturing capacity, Yan Arrouye, the inventor of the '959 patent; Mark Buckley, a financial analyst at Apple; and various Google employees, CNET will be covering the trial as it unfolds, Check back for updates, Updated at 1 p.m, PT on iphone screen protector edges not sticking April 22 to reflect changes in the accused devices and requested damages by Samsung, Samsung dropped its infringement claims against the iPad and lowered the amount it wanted from Apple in damages..